this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2026
1300 points (92.3% liked)

Leopards Ate My Face

9761 readers
221 users here now

Rules:

  1. The mods are fallible; if you've been banned or had a post/comment removed, please appeal.
  2. Off-topic posts will be removed. If you don't know what "Leopards ate my Face" is, try reading this post.
  3. If the reason your post meets Rule 1 isn't in the source, you must add a source in the post body (not the comments) to explain this. If the reason is in the source but is tedious to find (e.g. in a lengthy video), you must add an explanation for where it is.
  4. Posts should use high-quality sources (for a rough idea, check out this list), and posts should retain the title (if one exists) from works like news articles, videos, etc. You may (but need not) edit your post if the source changes the title. Other types of posts should have a title which accurately, relatively neutrally describes their contents.
  5. For accessibility reasons, an image of text must either have alt text or a transcription in the post body.
  6. Reposts within 1 year or the Top 100 of all time are subject to removal. Within moderator discretion, this doesn't just include reposts of the exact same media but also includes e.g. a secondary source telling basically the exact same story as another that was already posted.
  7. This is not exclusively a US politics community. You're encouraged to post stories about anyone from any place in the world at any point in history as long as you meet the other rules.
  8. All Lemmy.World Terms of Service apply.

Also feel free to check out:

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 33 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

While you and I can look at this and go “Wow, that’s not logical, she’s way better than Trump”, the Democratic campaign should have had political scientists and psychologists that knew about this well-documented phenomenon. I imagine they did, and ignored it, because siding against Israel would’ve cost money.

D and R parties both need independent voters to win any election. For example, even if every D voted for a D, they would lose without independents voting for them in significant numbers. This has been a political fact for many years.

So... why did the Harris campaign target REPUBLICAN voters (instead of Ds and independents)? They wasted a lot of vital time on that ("He doesn't need to know who you voted for" etc), and they knew that they would lose if they did so.

She knew it too, Harris isn't stupid. She took a knee.

[–] Khanzarate@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm not fully convinced the conspiracy is that deep, but also if hard evidence came out saying so, I wouldn't be surprised.

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I’m not fully convinced the conspiracy is that deep, but also if hard evidence came out saying so, I wouldn’t be surprised.

You don't have to believe my word, but answer this question. You are a Democratic veteran. You KNOW for a FACT that you need Democratic and Independent voters to win. Simple mathematics demands that you do so to win.

Why, oh why, would you pursue the Republican vote? They've never done this before in a Presidential election. It can't work. It's never worked before, anyway.

This was discussed openly during the campaign, tons of Republican outreach and advertising with the Harris run... why?

I cannot think of any other reason, I would actually feel a lot better if there was a logical reason, somebody help my troubled mind

[–] Khanzarate@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I think they sorta reasonably might have thought kamala would be another Bernie, who was pulling republicans from trump during the primaries against Hilary. They thought kamala had that sort of appeal.

It's not sound logic, but I think someone in politics who doesn't understand what drew people to Bernie could see the parallels and conclude if they focus on it, they can draw those Republicans in.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I think they sorta reasonably might have thought kamala would be another Bernie, who was pulling republicans from trump during the primaries against Hilary

And then acted entitled to the votes of a hostage electorate, just like Clinton did.

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I think they sorta reasonably might have thought kamala would be another Bernie

Reasonably? For what reason?

Bernie didn't win the Presidential election. He couldn't even win the nomination.

"Let's try something that has failed, instead of doing something fundamental that we have repeatedly used before to win elections."

"Let's try this idea! It's just Trump, who has won before. No worries"

Come on, she is not that stupid.

They are not that stupid.

Side note: They collected over a billion dollars for this failure (that we know of). New record!