this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)
Entrepreneur
0 readers
1 users here now
Rules
- No Personal Attacks - criticism of ideas is allowed, attacking people is not.
- Self Posts Only - links can only provide supplementary material. Your post must contain enough content to have a discussion.
- No “How To Get Rich Quick” posts - This community is not about making a quick buck. Posts asking the community how to make $X, without making specific reference to a reasonable idea, are not tolerated.
- Avoid unprofessional communication - Please treat fellow entrepreneurs like respected coworkers, label conversations if NSFW and avoid deliberate provocations.
Please feel free to provide evidence-based best practices, share a micro-victory, discuss strategy and concepts with a frame work, ask for feedback, and create professional conversation. Treat every post as if you're at work and representing the best version of yourself.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
$0
If ideas worth anything, there would be an idea marketplace.
While I agree that simply ideas are basically worth nothing, tbf an idea marketplace couldn't be implemented even if they would have value
Why not?
It would be possible using the patent system.
Step 1: people with ideas file provisional patent with sufficient detail to be considered an enabling disclosure.
Step 2: ideas are published on a marketplace website.
Step 3: idea buyers peruse the website
Step 4: idea buyer can purchase an idea. They get the rights to the provisional patent.
Step 5: idea buyer files a complete patent application (or PCT application) within 12 months of the provisional patent, listing the idea person as the inventor.
Step 6: everyone is happy
Step 1 is actually not necessary in countries that have a 'grace provision'. In 'grace provision' countries, this means an idea that is published within 12 months of the complete filing date cannot be used as prior art to invalidate the patent (if the person who published the idea is the same as the person filing the complete patent).
The enabling disclosure is key to the idea. You need to be very clear and specific about exactly how the invention works.
But this makes little to no sense, if for example, Jeff Bezos came up with the idea of “online book store” in 90s, then chances are that someone else had that idea, so it creates another useless legal battle where the only weapon the idea creator has is that ha patented it earlier, this could be detrimental to economy as monopolies would pop up way more often.
Mostly correct and I agree that almost all ideas (even good ones) are worth $0. It's all about execution. However, if you can come up with them consistently there are think tanks.
Hmm, that's a good answer.
Great perspective with regards to the marketplace notion...now with that said, you could argue that patents are the marketplace.
People with the idea and the ability to patent it create an idea with a potential value. That value is realized via commercialization, licensing, or litigation.
Thanks for making me think today.
The world is an idea marketplace. Those who recognise this wisely exchange their ideas.