Machine Learning

1 readers

1 users here now

Community Rules:

Be nice. No offensive behavior, insults or attacks: we encourage a diverse community in which members feel safe and have a voice.
Make your post clear and comprehensive: posts that lack insight or effort will be removed. (ex: questions which are easily googled)
Beginner or career related questions go elsewhere. This community is focused in discussion of research and new projects that advance the state-of-the-art.
Limit self-promotion. Comments and posts should be first and foremost about topics of interest to ML observers and practitioners. Limited self-promotion is tolerated, but the sub is not here as merely a source for free advertisement. Such posts will be removed at the discretion of the mods.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

communick@academy.garden

[D] Multiple documents reveal significant limitations of OpenAI's Assistants API for RAG (alien.top)

submitted 11 months ago by ian4321@alien.top to c/machinelearning@academy.garden

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The OpenAI RAG system struggled with multiple documents, showing inconsistent performance with our evaluation framework. However, performance improved markedly when all documents were uploaded as a single document. Despite current limitations, such as a 20-file limit per assistant and challenges in handling multiple documents, there is significant potential for improvement. Enhancing the Assistants API to match GPT quality and reducing restrictions could make it a leading RAG solution.

https://www.tonic.ai/blog/rag-evaluation-series-validating-openai-assistants-rag-performance

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Grouchy-Friend4235@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Well, it's not a database, just a next word predictor.