this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2026
40 points (95.5% liked)

Selfhosted

60426 readers
551 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For example, if I want a website where users can I signin to choose options such as changing or restarting a Docker container. Or various other systems level options available from a web interface.

I'm looking for something in the cloud but also something self hosted at home.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Strit@lemmy.linuxuserspace.show 29 points 2 months ago (2 children)

This sounds exactly like what Cockpit was made to do...

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 months ago

100%, Cockpit is what you're looking for OP.

[–] dudesss@lemmy.ca -5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (6 children)

Too many features. I should have mentioned that I want it very limited. For example, to give to clients to restart game servers.

Edit: Cockpit is great! But to give remote access to full user-level shell access is not something I want. It might have access to other features I would want to avoid like installing software. Instead I want strictly it to commands like,

  • Backup,
  • Restore,
  • Restart
  • Update,
  • Modify config files,
  • File download,
  • File upload
[–] skankhunt42@lemmy.ca 27 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You're better off telling us the problem you're trying to solve than come to us with a solution to something we have no idea about.

If you describe the problem first, we might have a better idea than a web shell, which in all honesty is a bad idea.

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 months ago

This. Sounds like a classic example of the XY Problem

[–] Strit@lemmy.linuxuserspace.show 9 points 2 months ago

You don't have to use all the features. Restarting a service is a pretty broad feature. If it's too broad, You will likely have to code something yourself.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 months ago

Too many features

What does that even mean? Are you looking for a bespoke system that does exactly what you want and nothing else?

[–] Magnum@infosec.pub 4 points 2 months ago

Just host a webpage with 7 buttons triggering off your shell scripts.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 months ago

Pterodactyl or Pelican if what you might want if you are looking to give tenants access to game servers on your own infrastructure.

https://pelican.dev/

https://pterodactyl.io/