this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2026
503 points (99.8% liked)

Technology

83930 readers
3448 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
503
Anna's Archive Loses $322 Million Spotify Piracy Case Without a Fight;In addition to the penalty, a permanent injunction required domain registrars and other parties to suspend the site's domain names (torrentfreak.com)
submitted 3 days ago by Deep@mander.xyz to c/technology@lemmy.world
87 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Spotify and several major record labels, including UMG, Sony, and Warner, secured a $322 million default judgment against the unknown operators of Anna's Archive. The shadow library failed to appear in court and briefly released millions of tracks that were scraped from Spotify via BitTorrent. In addition to the monetary penalty, a permanent injunction required domain registrars and other parties to suspend the site's domain names.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 71 points 3 days ago (6 children)

"Scraped from Spotify via Bitorrent" OK. That's not how that works.

[–] jeeva@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

...briefly released millions of tracks, scraped from Spotify, via Bittorrent.

Would have worked better with commas, but makes sense?

[–] GamingChairModel@lemmy.world 56 points 3 days ago (1 children)

briefly released millions of tracks that were scraped from Spotify via BitTorrent.

That's just an awkward sentence construction but it makes sense: they released track via Bittorrent. The tracks were scraped from Spotify.

I sold my car that was purchased from a dealership via private party sale.

I charged my laptop that normally accepts 100W via a 20W phone charger.

I would've used a "which" phrase with commas to avoid the confusion, but the sentence as written is valid and makes sense.

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Poorly worded

[–] fantacyde@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

They were meaning that they released via BitTorrent the tracks which were scraped from Spotify

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world -3 points 3 days ago

Or they don't understand the topic

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 days ago

I think it’s just poor wording. It says they released tracks that were scraped from Spotify via BitTorrent. I think the punctuation and sentence structure is awkward. I think what they were trying to say was more along the lines of “they scraped millions of tracks from Spotify, and released them via BitTorrent.”

Still not technically correct, because you don’t release things via BitTorrent. But it at least clarifies that the songs were first scraped, and then released via torrent.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Actually, for a while Spotify did use the BitTorrent protocol for content delivery. So this isn't too far-fetched.

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 2 points 2 days ago

Spotify itself started by using pirated music, so this is all a bit ironic.