this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)
Machine Learning
1 readers
1 users here now
Community Rules:
- Be nice. No offensive behavior, insults or attacks: we encourage a diverse community in which members feel safe and have a voice.
- Make your post clear and comprehensive: posts that lack insight or effort will be removed. (ex: questions which are easily googled)
- Beginner or career related questions go elsewhere. This community is focused in discussion of research and new projects that advance the state-of-the-art.
- Limit self-promotion. Comments and posts should be first and foremost about topics of interest to ML observers and practitioners. Limited self-promotion is tolerated, but the sub is not here as merely a source for free advertisement. Such posts will be removed at the discretion of the mods.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The same as always, using lightgbm.
Joke aside, you can train a LLM to give the result of 1+1 and it can sometimes be wright. That's an expensive way of solving that problem.
You can also develop a simple calculator, that will always get an accurate awnser.
My point being that simply because the algorithms you mentioned 'can' solve a problem, doesn't mean they are the best solution for that. That are a bunch of NLP problems that LLMs are supbar for exemple.
The future of ML in startups will be the same as it currently is: find the best solution to the problem given the particularities of the problem and the business constraints (i.e. money).