this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2026
232 points (97.9% liked)
Technology
42754 readers
162 users here now
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I can't believe any military operation allows the use of unsecured phones by personnel. Always blows my mind.
Military personnel are people too. Regular people. And most of the stuff the do is boring and uninteresting to adversaries. Putting too hard restrictions would just lower morale and risk future recruiting.
So like in any organization you rely on infosec training and hope that it will work. Like in any organization the human factor will cause it to occasionally fail.
No amount of infosec training will make your civilian iPhone secure. All I'm saying is that it's weird not to issue secure phones to personnel.
So you would have governments spend tax money on secure phones for personell to make Instagram posts and browse Pornhub?
I wouldn't have governments do anything, except disband and decommission all military assets, but if I were somehow in that position then yes I would recommend providing secure devices. The cost is insignificant - just buy one less fighter jet.
Sounds great. But I suspect the reality is they would be provided by the MIC at €/$10000 a piece, while they can for sure not buy fewer jets. They will happily slash your welfare though to afford it :)