58
Progressive Group Founded by Bernie Sanders Endorses Billionaire for California Governor
(theintercept.com)
this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2026
58 points (98.3% liked)
A Boring Dystopia
16439 readers
846 users here now
Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.
Rules (Subject to Change)
--Be a Decent Human Being
--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title
--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article
--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.
--Posts must have something to do with the topic
--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.
--No NSFW content
--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Absolutely clueless, tone-deaf, bullshit. And because California's so blue that the only way Republicans can win is if two Republicans win first and second in CA's nonpartisan primary and end up running against each other - which could happen, and would be hilarious - the Dem oligarchs will take Steyer's win as proof America wants to be ruled by its billionaire caste.
I was pretty certain, in 2024, that I wasn't going to vote, mainly because of Gaza. But the single moment I decided "fuck harm reduction, these people do not deserve a single additional moment of my time" and committed to not voting, was the moment hereditary billionaire JD Pritzker waltzed onto the stage at the Democratic convention and informed us all that we could only win if we rallied behind the good billionaires, like him, to defeat the evil billionaires, like Trump.
And Democrats are so fundamentally, profoundly servile to the interests of the billionaires that they're completely incapable of understanding how much ordinary Americans hate them.
So you didn't vote in order to own the libs, and you're still defending that decision?
Quit blaming other people for your failures, dems lost to Trump because they actively chose to suck ass in order to please their billionaire owners
STFU lol
It ain't your job to educate me, but if I can ask anyways, why would one opt to not vote out of principle? I went n' looked it up, yet the only mention of it being a conscious decision are spotty, single sentences. Everything else seems to focus on the socioeconomic difficulties people can experience.
To me, it would seem that voting for a non-mainstream party would be optimal if you don't trust the two-party system, wouldn't it?
I think the American version of first-past-the-post representative democracy in general is an oligarchic form of government that represses actual democracy. Think of how much money you need to win an election and where that money comes from. (I'll give you the answer: you either suck up to billionaires and their lobbyists or you're a billionaire yourself.)
If I cast a vote at all I'm participating in, and implicitly supporting, that broken system.
I don't have a moral obligation to vote for anybody. Or to vote at all.
So the question isn't "why don't I vote third party". The question is "what candidate appeals to me enough for me to participate in a system I have moral objections to". And the answer in 2024 was "none of them".
Besides, parties track the percentage of registered voters who vote and who don't. My absent vote shows up in the statistics as an absent vote. And if the Democrats have any path to reforming themselves it'll start by asking why voter turnout was depressed on the left and why so many people who voted Democrat in 2020 stayed home in 2024.
I can't speak for u/stabby_cicada but i've frequently run into a simple logical fallacy based on the circular reasoning that (not enough people vote for a third party so ) "a third-party will never win." Therefore people refuse to vote third-party.