this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2026
79 points (98.8% liked)

Linux

64843 readers
2133 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hello,

I've heard that Ubuntu may not fully prioritize user privacy and collects telemetry data. Could you please clarify:

Is this accurate? Are there Linux distributions that place a stronger emphasis on privacy?

Thank you 🙏🏼

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] megopie@beehaw.org 22 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Most distros don’t collect any data by default.

Basically any distro not built and maintained by a company will be a thousand times more private than Mac or windows. Arch and Debian are both good in that regard, most distros are derived from those. There is also Fedora which is a community project, but it’s very heavily involved with Red Hat inc who is owned by IBM. I’ve never heard about any privacy issues there, but, it’s worth keeping in mind.

If you want something super secure and locked down in regards to privacy, there is Tails which has a lot of neat tricks and tor built in. Not sure I’d recommend it as a daily driver but it’s got it’s use cases.

[–] Neptr@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Tails isn't really a security focused distro, no significant kernel or other security hardening. It is amnesic. Whonix (based on Kicksecure) is security hardened but still based on Debian which isn't great for a security base.

Secureblue is what I would recommend because it a security focused Linux distro that benefits from Fedora's SELinux, and has a bunch of its own additions.

QubesOS is obviously the best for security. Combine that with a Whonix or Secureblue guest OS and you're perfect.

[–] LeTak@feddit.org 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I completely forgot secureblue. But it was not worth the hassle for my working environment

[–] Neptr@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 hours ago

It really isn't that different than regular Fedora Atomic. It offers easy toggles for most security features and some convenient utilities to make things easier.

[–] megopie@beehaw.org 1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

It is very private, by nature of it recording so little and leaving so little trace. Which is what was being asked about, not strictly speaking security.

[–] Neptr@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 18 hours ago

I was specifically responding to at the end where you say it is "super secure" at the end of your comment. It is not a security focused distro. It isnt even (only) a privacy distro. It is an anonymity distro. Fedora is private, but it doesnt store everything in RAM or route everything through Tor, so it isn't amnesic or anonymity focused.

When compared to Whonix (which is Debian based like Tails) or Secureblue (Fedora Atomic based), Tails doesnt do nearly anything to harden its base other than to strictly proxy the network through Tor, run in RAM, and some default apps.

[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 day ago

I’ve never heard about any privacy issues there, but, it’s worth keeping in mind

You would hear about it, and as someone happy there, it's a recurring nightmare, but an actual credible threat would be worth so many dollars lost to them that there's a low likelihood. Shit, Torvalds runs fedora, still, keep a weather eye open.

Mostly Linux has the virtue of the many eyes on open source protection, but it's far from absolute, as the rise of supply chain exploits demonstrates.