this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)
Machine Learning
1 readers
1 users here now
Community Rules:
- Be nice. No offensive behavior, insults or attacks: we encourage a diverse community in which members feel safe and have a voice.
- Make your post clear and comprehensive: posts that lack insight or effort will be removed. (ex: questions which are easily googled)
- Beginner or career related questions go elsewhere. This community is focused in discussion of research and new projects that advance the state-of-the-art.
- Limit self-promotion. Comments and posts should be first and foremost about topics of interest to ML observers and practitioners. Limited self-promotion is tolerated, but the sub is not here as merely a source for free advertisement. Such posts will be removed at the discretion of the mods.
founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The only way to do it closely for text would be to log every message for every generation with a creation time.
Much of what AI writes is exactly what a human would say.
Not sure how logging with a creation time helps. But yes most of what it writes is verbatim what a human would type
Logging the creation time would help establish when the text was created or recreated. If someone was to, for instance, write the text before the creation time, they could argue that they came up with it before the AI. If someone used the text years later for an assignment, it would be a hard argument to make that AI came up with it unless it had propogated online.
If it happens within the timeframe of the assignment being set and say a month... then that is much stronger correlation that it might have come from AI, increasing the 9s in the probability.
The note AI would actually have to log everytime it generated the text.