Flippanarchy
Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.
Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.
This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.
Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Rules
-
If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text
-
If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.
-
Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.
-
Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.
-
No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.
-
This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.
-
No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.
Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.
view the rest of the comments
I've always looked at it as they defined Democracy rather than made it.
Maybe also the first to set down formal rules. Getting the boys together to make a decision is one thing. A rule that everybody has an equal say, and that it's 50%+1 for a decision to be made is different. Also, rules about when people are allowed to vote, if they're allowed to re-vote, what things require a 2/3s margin vs. just a majority. Even things like if you're allowed to sell your vote, if you're allowed to make a speech before you vote, if you're allowed to wait to see how other people vote before you vote... There are a lot of things we take for granted about how the process works.
The way i remember it being thought in school, it seemed to imply that they created the fenomena of "people ruling", that it didnt exist before them. If you went into more depth into the question, you would get to this reduced thesis that they only defined a system that was supposedly democratic. But most kids wont pay close attention, and this euro-centric propagada succeeds in forming their worldview.
yep, they sure defined it. democracy is when a small fraction of the men get to make decisions for everyone, including the women, the poors and the slaves.
it clicks nicely with our modern western concept of democracy.