this post was submitted on 03 May 2026
346 points (98.3% liked)

Funny

14873 readers
1226 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Eric@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Maybe this is just my Northeast US prejudice, but brick is so much classier. Also concrete doesn't age, but rebar sure does

[–] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Tell that to the romens, concrete ags fantastically if built for the purpose of lasting a long ass time.

[–] Eric@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Roman concrete is unreinforced, meaning no rebar inside to rust. You can't use modern construction techniques with unreinforced concrete. It can't handle tension well.

[–] Test_Tickles@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Seriously, there's a reason we don't "build like the Romans". We would be using 10x the concrete that we use now. We can't even keep up with concrete demand now, I can't even imagine how much worse the environment would already be if we needed 10x the concrete.

[–] PuddleOfKittens@sh.itjust.works 1 points 21 hours ago

If we needed 10x the concrete, we wouldn't have built so many cheap ugly concrete buildings.

[–] Eric@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago

Yes I've been to the Pantheon and those walls are thicc