this post was submitted on 04 May 2026
321 points (98.8% liked)
Science Fiction
18674 readers
1 users here now
Welcome to /c/ScienceFiction
December book club canceled. Short stories instead!
We are a community for discussing all things Science Fiction. We want this to be a place for members to discuss and share everything they love about Science Fiction, whether that be books, movies, TV shows and more. Please feel free to take part and help our community grow.
- Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally insult others.
- Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, or advocating violence will be removed.
- Spam, self promotion, trolling, and bots are not allowed
- Put (Spoilers) in the title of your post if you anticipate spoilers.
- Please use spoiler tags whenever commenting a spoiler in a non-spoiler thread.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I haven't seen any of the sequels, but why do they keep letting JJ Abrams write/direct movies? He ruined Star Trek too.
I've liked a lot of Abrams' work, but yes, he really shat on Star Wars/Trek. I find he has great ideas, and great starts for those ideas, but he just gets bogged down with all the history and storylines, ending up with an absolute slog, with lots of explosions and lens flares to distract from that. So, given all that, I'm not surprised with his disappointing results with both multi-episode stories told over decades.
I'm asking this trying not to sound like a dick, but sincerely - what Abram's work do you like? His entire filmography looks so weak these days, and it's even worse if we just evaluate him as a director.
I liked Super 8, but that's all that stands out to me. Even that maybe felt more "Spielberg at home", but it was entertaining.
I enjoyed the Alias and Fringe series, especially the overall concept. They both staggered hard for the last season or so. I didn't realize Regarding Henry was a film of his, which I thought was excellent. I didn't mind Felicity, but I think Alias was a better spin on the core concept.
Yes, as a director, im not overly impressed, but like I said, I liked his ideas, and the initial setup, but the wrap-up sucked. The last has a much bigger impact on movies, and wrapping up established world will only highlight his weaknesses.
I was a big fan of 2009's Star Trek. Saw it a bunch in theaters. I've rewatched it a time or two recently (wife digs it) and, aside from the cast, I really don't like it. It doesn't feel like Star Trek (and I'm someone who will find things to defend about Discovery and loved Starfleet Academy while DS9 remains my all-time favorite series). But boyhowdy is Chris Pine great as Kirk. Zachary Quinto is also phenomenal as Spock. I could actually go either way with the castings of Uhura, Scotty, and Sulu. But Karl Urban as McCoy must be defended at all costs.
Abrams, when it comes to Star Trek and Star Wars feels like he's making what popular culture thinks of those franchises and not what the franchises themselves are all about, if that makes sense. It's almost a parody.
yeah, he's trying to make money. you do that by appealing to the LCD, violence and sex and easy to digest plots full of tropes.
thoughtful sci fi is niche, it doesn't make any money.
because people love his movies.