this post was submitted on 05 May 2026
1397 points (99.2% liked)

Work Reform

16265 readers
2632 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And nothing materially changed between then and now.

I'd hate to break it to you, but that just isn't true. Manufacturing capabilities have left the continent. People no longer have the relevant expertise to pass on through apprenticeships. We'd basically be starting from scratch, and with corporate hegemony built on cheap overseas labor to compete with.

That doesn't mean it wouldn't be worth doing, but let's not fool ourselves about the uphill battle that it would be, or the very real possibility that people would just keep using the cheap convenient corporations instead of supporting local fabs

[–] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You're absolutely right. The word I chose was poor. What I meant was the underlying rules of the material world hasn't changed. Atoms still act the same way, and all that. It was an exceptionally weird way to make an even weirder point, but yeah.

[–] krisevol@lemmus.org 2 points 1 day ago

The rules absolutely have changed. Distribution networks and data transfer are completely different today than back then.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Alright well when you figure out the precise alloy of steel to optimize a spring for required specs, and the exact forging, quenching, and tempering processes and temperatures to use, as well as the specs for the equipment to extrude the wire and twist it into the right shape with enough precision to be commercially replicable, then we can all use your springs in all the things that we build. Now we just need someone else to build literally every other part.

The thing about a lot of modern technology, is that it's made with other technology, which in turn requires still more technology. So when manufacturing capabilities disappear from a continent, it's not so simple to just rebuild them. You need to rebuild the stuff that's required to build them first.

And you also need technical knowledge, niche skill sets and tooling, and sources of often highly specific materials.

This isn't meant to sound discouraging, but it's best to understand the scale of the task from the outset.

[–] SLVRDRGN@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Great, you've outlined the work that's needed. To quote a fave movie of mine: "'It's not possible'. 'No, it's necessary'."

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago

Yeah, you're right. We should start with the easy wins, like making soaps, baked goods, hand tools, etc.

We can work our way up to more complex fabs and maybe some day we can have a worker's collective to manufacture semiconductors, but we shouldn't let the immensity of the task get in the way of starting on the simpler aspects.

[–] its_kim_love@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 day ago

Sorry, rereading what I wrote, it seems unnecessarily harsh.

You're right though, there are plenty of things that cottage industries absolutely can and should reclaim. I guess I was just thinking about highly technical fabs, like computer chips and medical equipment.

Overall though, I'm very much in support of the idea of cottage industries in general.