Linux

65096 readers

828 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 7 years ago

MODERATORS

nooter692@lemmy.ml

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

-6

systemd being mainstream is alarming and goes against the philosophy of linux (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by OppressedBread@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml

100 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I know I'm not the only one that said this but I really can't stand how systemd is becoming "the norm" init system for every major distro, this is bad.

it is especially bad when certain apps are built specifically for systemd, locking users behind a specific init system and compatibility issues spark because you don't use a mainstream one , this doesn't go with the idea of Linux, which is having "freedom" with your os, picking and choosing what goes on and off while still being usable.

I switched to artix Linux with openRC a while ago the moment systemd added code for potential age verification, they called it malicious compliance but I really didn't like the smell of that, now I'm fighting tooth and nail with some applications because they're systemd dependent, resulting in me creating custom scripts to mitigate their issues.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] CorrenteAlternata@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It's not the software provider's duty to support every platform. Mullvad officially only supports Ubuntu, Debian and Fedora.

Their obligation ends there. By using any other distro, even a systemd one, you're taking responsibility to make it work in your system. That's the freedom that linux offers you! The ability to do whatever weird shit you want, at your risk and without any warranty explicit or implied.

Become a package maintainer for your distro to add support for mullvad and stop complaining.

[–] OppressedBread@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm not saying they have to support other init systems, I know it's my responsibility and i made it work, I agree with you.

[–] CorrenteAlternata@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Good for you!

That means that you indeed have options! Systemd isn't limiting your freedom! If anything, it's limiting your easiness of choice. And for that I understand your feelings, but you really can't do anything about it. Except maybe become a developer for a competing init system, so that it becomes better than systemd. Because the systemd is here to stay, until something better comes to replace it :)

[–] JadeEast@quokk.au 1 points 1 day ago

dinit is better and major distros should be looking at switching before ibm gets their hooks in even more.