Books

7972 readers

136 users here now

A community for all things related to Books.

Rules

Be Nice. No personal attacks or hate speech.
No spam. All posts should be related to discussion or reviews related to books. (Please avoid posts that are just a link to the book and a generic summary)
No self promotion.

Official Bingo Posts:

Related Communities

!books@piefed.world (Piefed Sibling Community)
!comicbooks@lemmy.world
!fantasy@lemmy.ml

Community icon by IconsBox (from freepik.com)

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

dresden@discuss.online

dresden_do@lemmy.world

JaymesRS@literature.cafe

JaymesRS@lemmy.world

dresden@piefed.world

Anthony Horowitz Says He Uses ChatGPT in Writing - Kirkus (www.kirkusreviews.com)

submitted 19 hours ago by JoshsJunkDrawer@lemmy.world to c/books@lemmy.world

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Imagine being proud and ignorant enough to come out and admit to using AI to write for you. Incredible.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] TheV2@programming.dev 6 points 15 hours ago

If you were a writer and I helped you with research, e.g. I suggest an adjective to you at your request that you even dismiss after some pondering, then is it correct to say that you used me to write for you? Is it the same as if I was your ghostwriter?

My point is not that ChatGPT for research is awesome, but that the article's headline and OP's conclusion are very misleading. While I can relate to that enthusiasm, I don't believe in mincing down a source to my narrative. It's even counter-productive to spread awareness about ChatGPT's incorrectness using an incorrect takeaway from someone's statements...