this post was submitted on 06 May 2026
619 points (84.2% liked)
Work Reform
16265 readers
1116 users here now
A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.
Our Philosophies:
- All workers must be paid a living wage for their labor.
- Income inequality is the main cause of lower living standards.
- Workers must join together and fight back for what is rightfully theirs.
- We must not be divided and conquered. Workers gain the most when they focus on unifying issues.
Our Goals
- Higher wages for underpaid workers.
- Better worker representation, including but not limited to unions.
- Better and fewer working hours.
- Stimulating a massive wave of worker organizing in the United States and beyond.
- Organizing and supporting political causes and campaigns that put workers first.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Progressives are not the ones who put you in this position. You did by consistently voting for weak, ineffective leaders. Low information, low engagement voters are what caused Trump to win. You can't win those people with a "We're not Trump" message, because for them that message is meaningless, they don't have any party loyalties or even research who they vote for. They vote based on the message, and you've failed to deliver a good message for the past 10 years.
Also, learn the context of the original comic before embarrassing yourself in the replies.
If progressives voted in the primaries we'd have policy representation in the party. But we mostly don't because of takes like yours.
We were denied that opportunity in 2024.
Were you? I voted in my primaries. Everyone I know did too.
I voted in the primaries I had available to me. You got the genocidal shit you wanted without a primary.
Or because the corporate wing of the DNC sabotages them at every turn.
Except for when they get elected, which is pretty often.
Which comic do you think I’ve misinterpreted, cranky progressive?
The one that this meme format used, dipshit. Have you bothered to learn what happens on it and why it's being used here?
Well, there’s a comic in the post, and a comic in the comment thread we’re replying under, so I just wanted to clarify which one you were referring to. The “Lucy and the Football” trope is commonly used as an analogy for a sucker who keeps falling for the same trick. In this case, it’s calling progressives who vote for Democrats suckers, implying progressives should not vote for Democrats. This helps Republicans win. Dipshit.
No, it's not that. The lesson of the comic is that Lucy should stop fucking yoinking the ball every time he tries to kick it. LUCY is the one being an asshole. AKA, the DNC begs for votes from progressives, promising things to them, and then they proceed to not only NOT do what they promised, but also refuse to do their fucking job. Which is the bare fucking minimum people should ask of politicians, but according to people like YOU that's too much to ask and will result in them fucking losing as if criticism is going to derail their chances. If criticism derailed politicians into losing, TRUMP WOULD NOT BE IN THE WHITE HOUSE.
You're part of the "54% of Americans read and interpret text at a level below 6th grade" statistic.
Your bespoke interpretation of the Lucy comic is self-serving and almost certainly wrong. Charles Schulz is long dead, so we can’t know for sure, but I’d bet if we could ask him what the point of the strip was, it would be something along the lines of “It’s funny that Charlie keeps falling for the same trick” and not “The reader is supposed to tsk tsk and say ‘Lucy really should cut that out!’”
It’s called slapstick. Believe it or not, it’s supposed to be funny.