Linux

I feel like there's a fair criticism here as much as one might disagree with the framing, with the criticism probably most properly directed at the corporate-backed distributions and the structure of FOSS funding.

Like, yeah, IBM and the like don't owe the remaining ecosystem anything, but if FOSS had less capitalism focused funding then there might be more focus on not throwing so many resources at a single init system that feature-wise seems to be questionably enterprise-focused. (Let's face it, most average home users don't need 90% of what systemd can do, and would occasionally benefit from alternative options. It's also in the spirit of FOSS to retain more nimble alternatives, so that contributions are easier.)

So I feel like the comments pointing out that nobody needs to use it, have a point but meanwhile perhaps they're missing that there is still some legit ecosystem worry to be had.