this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Machine Learning

1 readers
1 users here now

Community Rules:

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Looks like classic causal inference, the type would see in Pearl or Econometrics. I don't understand where the ML comes in.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NeKleineMetAndalouse@alien.top 1 points 10 months ago

Learning causal effects from observational data is not straightforward, because of two reasons:

  1. you have strong confounder bias: treatments are not assigned at random (unlike in an active experiment setup like an RCT). Patients who are more sick will receive more treatment. And
  2. you never observe counterfactuals (if you treat a patient, you do not observe what would have happened if you had not treated this patient).

ML can help tackling the first issue by learning proper representations for your treated and non-treated groups. Simplified: if you manage to find representations for your control and treatment groups so that the distributions of your representations (which contain your confounding factors), you can make unbiased treatment effect estimates.

The second issue can be solved by using (semi-) synthetic data.