this post was submitted on 03 May 2026
52 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

11951 readers
641 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Senators say they're concerned about the growing list of vacancies in the upper chamber, as the appointment process for new members remains unclear.

There are currently nine vacant seats in the Senate, with six more senators due to retire by the end of 2026. Prime Minister Mark Carney has not appointed any senators since taking office last spring.

The federal government's website says there are also 24 vacancies on the independent advisory board for Senate appointments, the body that provides non-binding, merit-based recommendations to the prime minister.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wraekscadu@vargar.org 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

In theory, yes. In practice, they're just a waste of money and time. Effectively, it's just the PM who appoints them. Hence, what ends up happening is that it gets packed with liberal and conservative donors who act as nothing but rubber stamps for Parliament's bills.

Here's the NDP's stance on this for example.

[–] Contrary@lemmy.world -1 points 4 days ago

So, to paraphrase, you believe that there are insufficient checks and balances, and support eliminating the few that exist because they are insufficient and cost exactly 0% of the federal budget? Did I get that right?