Cybersecurity

9943 readers

158 users here now

c/cybersecurity is a community centered on the cybersecurity and information security profession. You can come here to discuss news, post something interesting, or just chat with others.

THE RULES

Instance Rules

Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
No Ads / Spamming.
No pornography.

Community Rules

Idk, keep it semi-professional?
Nothing illegal. We're all ethical here.
Rules will be added/redefined as necessary.

If you ask someone to hack your "friends" socials you're just going to get banned so don't do that.

Learn about hacking

Hack the Box

Try Hack Me

Pico Capture the flag

Other security-related communities !databreaches@lemmy.zip !netsec@lemmy.world !securitynews@infosec.pub !cybersecurity@infosec.pub !pulse_of_truth@infosec.pub

Notable mention to !cybersecuritymemes@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

kid@sh.itjust.works

Lanky_Pomegranate530@midwest.social

166

60% of MD5 password hashes are crackable in under an hour (www.theregister.com)

submitted 2 days ago by kid@sh.itjust.works to c/cybersecurity@sh.itjust.works

41 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Were the hashes salted?

[–] khannie@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'm not sure it matters. If not it's rainbow table time but they did use a very high end graphics card to test so it's functionally equivalent to salting (except for the tiny extra compute to concatenate the strings before hashing).

I feel like it was just a marketing exercise to show how shit MD5 is.