Privacy

48473 readers

1441 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago

MODERATORS

403

Remember when they were calling for regime change in China because of mass surveillance? This is the USA today (www.youtube.com)

submitted 2 days ago by iByteABit@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

53 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] haxboar@hexbear.net 21 points 2 days ago

This world you keep imagining where Kamala would have invaded more countries than we have in this past year alone is quite the sight.

Where did they say that?

How many times will congress fail resolutions to narrow her war powers?

Probably zero, considering that they didn't even consider doing it to Obama or Biden. Ya know, the guys who bombed bunches of kids.

Will she fill her cabinet with actual circus clowns instead of the hand picked pool of media sycophants who aren’t experts in their fields?

She would have picked liars, simps, and sycophants, just like Biden, Obama, and Clinton did.

The “but Kamala” card requires entertaining the idea that literally any president other than the one that got voted in would have been able to outpace the malignant narcissism of senile Emperor Nero over here.

No, it just requires looking at her predecessors, and what she said she would do.

It’s not an argument in good faith. It’s an argument for the guy who babbled incoherently about how tariffs work and then did exactly what he said he would.

Wait, so your post full of made-up arguments are in good faith?

funny-clown-hammer