this post was submitted on 09 May 2026
342 points (98.9% liked)
Privacy
48501 readers
1695 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Chrome users are likely not readers of privacy blogs. So 'fury' sounds like a strong word considering those same users are blissfully unawares and there is no comment in the article from google or their intention to respond to the reported abuse
They should be put onto privacy blogs so they understand its fucked and use way better options
Clickbait headline.
"fury and "sneakily" are loaded terms. You can find a furious person on any topic on social media and "sneakily" is nonsense, they were trying to delete a file that Chrome requires and so Chrome fixes the install when it runs.
They even note that you can disable it in settings, though not without making it sound like an unusually hard thing to do: "manually digging through setting"
Clickbait headline, ragebait article. Anything for some advertising dollars.
I agree it's a hyperbolic headline and article; more of an opinion piece than news. It's subjective but I think I would describe it as "sneaky" to add a 4gb AI component to a browser. The AI features were added as a default feature, opt-outs were only added later, and the users are not asked for permission before the download of the 4gb file to support the AI service. This doesn't benefit users; it benefits Google in it's quest to try to dominate the AI space by pushing it's own AI features and integrations.
Just to be clear from the start, I don't use Chrome (or any Google products or services) and recommend everyone switch to Firefox/Firefox forks which are more privacy friendly.
I completely agree that it should be opt-in as well.
Google CONSTANTLY adds and removes default features from Chrome without any user notice (outside of patch notes) and many without the ability to opt out (Manifest v3, for example). Most people simply don't care to pay attention to the patch notes, which is understandable.
But, this specific AI thing isn't one of them.
Like you said, this is Google attempting to dominate the AI space my pushing it's own AI features and integrations.
This means a lot of self-promotion
They have a blog post:
https://blog.google/products-and-platforms/products/search/ai-mode-chrome/
An announcement video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=56b9uHAcHYc
Developer documentation:
https://developer.chrome.com/docs/ai/built-in
A product page:
https://gemini.google/overview/gemini-in-chrome/
(There's also YT advertisements and text ads, which I've seen on work PCs but I have them blocked at home so I have no links to examples)
The article, and many other articles sharing the same framing, are simply cashing in on outrage by ragebaiting the anti-AI crowd. Google has been loudly promoting their AI services and integration in all of their products. It is not at all surprising that Chrome is included in that and Google has made every attempt to tell every person on Earth that this is the case.