this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
13 points (100.0% liked)
Web Development
0 readers
1 users here now
Icon base by Delapouite under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Currently, uBlock Origin and other ad blockers rely on features enabled by the
webRequestBlocking
permission, which lets them block any request that is only useful for ads or tracking. Manifest V3 hideswebRequestBlocking
abilities except from extensions that are force-installed, or installed through policy for an organization.That said, Chrome removing Manifest V2 will not kill uBlock Origin on Chrome. uBlock Origin's Manifest V3 support page says as much:
In practice, though, that means Chrome users who don't switch to Firefox will probably need to make do with uBlock Lite (which, for example, cannot yet circumvent YouTube's new anti-adblocker popup). Meanwhile, Manifest V2 will join the list of reasons that uBlock Origin works best on Firefox. A comparison of uBlock Lite vs uBlock Origin
Anyway, that's the challenge (and gorhill's workaround so far). You can follow gorhill's progress at https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uBlock-issues/issues/338
welp! thanks for laying it out.
I'm curious how, if at all, this will affect Brave browser who is chromium based but natively bakes in ad block and tracker block. I assume manifest v3 is an API change, so unless Brave uses the API under the hood they should not be affected. But their performance is pretty stellar so maybe they have something more native to achieve this.
EDIT: WOW! checked the bug tracker and manifest V3 announcement goes back to 2018
Brave plans to continue supporting Manifest V2 after Google kills it. For Ungoogled Chromium, however, it's still undecided, likely depending on whether UG contributors are willing to maintain it.
you're incredibly helpful! thanks for linking these threads