this post was submitted on 10 May 2026
74 points (98.7% liked)

Flippanarchy

2517 readers
588 users here now

Flippant Anarchism. A lighter take on social criticism with the aim of agitation.

Post humorous takes on capitalism and the states which prop it up. Memes, shitposting, screenshots of humorous good takes, discussions making fun of some reactionary online, it all works.

This community is anarchist-flavored. Reactionary takes won't be tolerated.

Don't take yourselves too seriously. Serious posts go to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Rules


  1. If you post images with text, endeavour to provide the alt-text

  2. If the image is a crosspost from an OP, Provide the source.

  3. Absolutely no right-wing jokes. This includes "Anarcho"-Capitalist concepts.

  4. Absolutely no redfash jokes. This includes anything that props up the capitalist ruling classes pretending to be communists.

  5. No bigotry whatsoever. See instance rules.

  6. This is an anarchist comm. You don't have to be an anarchist to post, but you should at least understand what anarchism actually is. We're not here to educate you.

  7. No shaming people for being anti-electoralism. This should be obvious from the above point but apparently we need to make it obvious to the turbolibs who can't control themselves. You have the rest of lemmy to moralize.


Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] stabby_cicada@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

My favorite example of anarcho-bullshittism is anarcho-monarchism, the most famous proponent of which was J. R. R. Tolkien. No, really.

[โ€“] PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

To me that reads as a guy (Tolkien) coming to grips with reality about a handful of things but then stopping short. Wishing to retreat, really, to a "simpler" time, from his perspective (read: lib shit, tbh). His "anarchism" seems real, in that he sees clearly the fundamental issue with humans operating in a deeply articulated government structure - those who see it as a game, game it well.

Not exactly defending the guy, I don't actually know him lol, but there wasn't much "and that's why monarchy should be preferred", I was kinda looking to see what he'd say there. Seemed more just "and people doing more of their own governance happened and was clearly better under a smaller "state". Like a good old fashioned monarchy, I liked that better and not just me, wasn't that better? record-scratch-noise"

So I guess on balance I read "anarcho-lib-shit" over "anarcho-monarchism" overall lol ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ

[Edit to add - thanks for the share, not grumping at ya, just enjoying what ya shared]

[โ€“] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

In other words, what was Aragorn's tax policy? Tolkien never says because he refuses the reality that a king needs one.

[โ€“] A404@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 weeks ago

I dunno, I think he meant anarchism but with a symbolic monarch who has soft power only.