this post was submitted on 14 May 2026
156 points (97.6% liked)

Linux

13652 readers
669 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Since Microsoft owns Github, Gitlab is Corp owned now since 2022, why are so many who preach privacy or using Linux, etc, still using a MS product?

Genuine questions. I'm assumming either familiarity & simplicity with GH or difficulty migrating elsewhere?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ell1e@leminal.space 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I feel like it's been going downhill since 2019, given the point in time Microsoft acquired them was in 2018 I'd say people have just not wanted to acknowledge the trajectory. (That included me.)

Every big feature since 2019 has been enterprise slop, in my opinion:

  • In 2019 they announced dependabot. What's wrong with it?

    It's not configurable, rather than allowing a universal mechanism so people can feed dependencies into it via some custom tool that e.g. generates a standardized listing, it only supports the popular package managers. This is exactly what big enterprise wants since they only care about their super old codebases and what those use, not any upcoming stack.

  • In 2019, they also announced security advisories. What's wrong with it?

    That Github to this day in 2026, hasn't bothered to add the most basic feature that regular FOSS projects would need to handle security reports, which is confidential issues. Instead, the assumption seems to be you're either a big enterprise that already has some dedicated security team with their own email infrastructure, or Microsoft doesn't care about you.

  • In 2020, they announced Github's Codespaces. What's wrong with it?

    It makes the UI more complicated and as far as I know leaves buttons for it everywhere that can't be turned off even if you don't want it. And it's a vendor lock-in feature that's expensive, the average small FOSS project will neither have the budget to use it nor likely care to do so.

  • Then of course the entire AI slop spin since 2025 ish.

There's probably more, but those are the big ones that I've noticed that made me suspicious of where this was going.

[–] prettybunnys@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You’re not wrong.

But … it’s also been convenient and largely free for most use cases and has had a better feature set then most alternates without having to host your own.

If you could host your own Gitlab was the choice.

The reliability issues of late is what is making most people actually contemplate moving.

[–] ell1e@leminal.space 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I've moved to Codeberg. It works well enough for me.

Gitlab is trying hard to ruin the software so beware of that.

[–] prettybunnys@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago

Yeah, things have been shook hard as of late.

My organization ( a Fortune 500) is taking serious consideration into extricating from GitHub, which is going to be a huge task.

Gitlab was our obvious first choice because a few projects we have an instance of it, and it works well … but they’re trying to do the same shit.

Most of our developers are fine to just use git and many of us do that these days.

My dev box has a 100% uptime if I turn it on, and IT backs it up.