this post was submitted on 14 May 2026
144 points (98.0% liked)

Linux

13635 readers
919 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Since Microsoft owns Github, Gitlab is Corp owned now since 2022, why are so many who preach privacy or using Linux, etc, still using a MS product?

Genuine questions. I'm assumming either familiarity & simplicity with GH or difficulty migrating elsewhere?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] cecilkorik@piefed.ca 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

For private repos you could always host your own Forgejo. That way they're actually private, too, not that Codeberg is untrustworthy, but not needing to trust anyone is even better.

[โ€“] BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

I mean I'm not really concerned about it being actually private, I just need to not have asset creators become pissed at me for publicly hosting their paid assets. Self hosting forgejo is on my to-do list but until then I'm using GitHub as a free project host for my unity/blender projects with paid assets. A single one of those projects easily blows past the codeberg 100MB private repo limit.

Besides that, basically the only use I have for GitHub is to contribute to repos on GitHub or to open / comment on issues. So it feels kind of useless to use codeberg since it defeats the whole purpose when the repos I want to interact with aren't there.

Self hosting also means I wouldn't be able to accept PRs, comments, or issues from other people unless I let them create accounts, which is something I don't want to moderate. I was waiting for forgejo to get federation to self host it but I haven't seen an update from them about that in a while.

So basically there are 2 things I use GitHub for:

  • Keeping private projects safe, which are too big for codeberg to allow
  • Opening issues on repos that are on GitHub, so using codeberg completely defeats the purpose

Codeberg is like a GitHub where the projects I want to interact with don't exist, and copying the projects there doesn't help me give feedback to the original authors.