this post was submitted on 14 May 2026
279 points (100.0% liked)

PC Gaming

14698 readers
458 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
UncleBadTouch@lemmy.ca
EXiLExJD@lemmy.ca
KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
279
Kickstarter Reportedly Forced To Ban NSFW Content By Stripe (kotaku.com)
submitted 4 days ago by alessandro@lemmy.ca to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca
65 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Curiosity since this seems to have irritated some people. Would you suggest that a platform not be regulated in some way if it where enabling the creation of exploitive and hateful content?

Even putting aside that you literally had a question in the comment, posting your opinion in a public forum and then expecting that your opinion is the end of the discussion is asinine at best. I’m not interested in discussing the semantics of rhetorical devices, I was just trying to help you understand why you were being downvoted. A mistake I don’t plan on making again.

[–] ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I had no question in the original post, making no mention of the edit after.

I didn't expect it to simply be the end all statement, but a number of down votes without explanation prompted me to inquire on why.

What seems to sum up the argument though is that censorship is always bad, unless it's the sort that you and the majority of society agree with. My suggestion originally was that indeed some is required, to maintain civil society, but who decides it is hard to say.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I literally quoted your question to you.

Then when somebody answered your inquiry you started arguing with them about whether or not you had even asked anything and then continued to not read their response.

Your summary tells me that at this point you’re being intentionally closed minded. I have no intention of continuing this conversation.

[–] ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com -1 points 3 days ago

Yes, the part preceded by the word EDIT: was a question. Whatever, have fun