this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)
Entrepreneur
0 readers
1 users here now
Rules
- No Personal Attacks - criticism of ideas is allowed, attacking people is not.
- Self Posts Only - links can only provide supplementary material. Your post must contain enough content to have a discussion.
- No “How To Get Rich Quick” posts - This community is not about making a quick buck. Posts asking the community how to make $X, without making specific reference to a reasonable idea, are not tolerated.
- Avoid unprofessional communication - Please treat fellow entrepreneurs like respected coworkers, label conversations if NSFW and avoid deliberate provocations.
Please feel free to provide evidence-based best practices, share a micro-victory, discuss strategy and concepts with a frame work, ask for feedback, and create professional conversation. Treat every post as if you're at work and representing the best version of yourself.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Nope, 1/3 is reasonable. you might have a little 'bonus' to the 'lead' founder, but 50% 25% 25% doesn't make sense this early.
if the issue is about salary, because he wants to live, then thats separate to ownership.
currently theres no revenues or even a business. not until a shippable product has been released.
if business founder is already playing hardball, thats reflective of the future relationship you will have with them, i imagine if you cut him out fully, 0%, then he will try and open a competing business.
Charisma is easy to find. experience and knowledge isn't and track record is really what matters.
you should also peg the equity vesting to target - so in this scenario i might say something like -
until product is launched we all have 1/3 equity
once the product is launched, and released and you manage to hit number is sales then we will transfer 5% each to you.
if the target isn't hit, then its still a 1/3 spit until its it.
in other words, if he wants the lion share of the equity, he needs to work for it.
tech founders are harder to find and replace, thats just simple fact r/startups is full of ppl begging to find CTOs.