politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
I'll save you a click:
Clickbait title, with a massively editorialized article. The only thing of substance is the multi-paragraph quote from politico.
Still shit, but nowhere near the hyperbolizing superlative that the article/title frames it as.
Edit: one thing I notice is that since they set the claims process to end in December 2028, that indicates that they know there's at least a possibility they won't be reelected.
Maybe they haven't rigged the elections as much as they want us to believe?
Thanks for that. Most commenters (me too) got totally triggered by that stupid headline, but this is fucking disgusting. But I'm getting tired of going into details with this admin, because even if one or two things it does aren't completely evil, that cannot change my final judgement. But having somebody extract the main points helps, thank you again.
Also for ending on a positive note. It's not naive to believe this shitshow will end rather sooner than later, and doomerism doesn't help.
Yeah, it really bothers me. Especially stuff like the DailyBeast and MidasTouch. They're just so clickbaity and editorialized, hyperbolizing and spinning and just in general not being good journalism.
Like, there are so many factual and accurate ways to criticize the current administration. Let's just stick to the facts and avoid reactionary sensationalism, because that just discredits all the legitimate critique. It's a lot harder to argue with someone when they're used to hearing that kind of bullshit and tuning out anything that sounds remotely similar.
And then whenever I call out bad journalism, disinformation, logical fallacies, or other bad-faith arguments, people attack me as if I'm attacking the position itself and not the presentation of it. I might support socialism, but if someone frames it in a way that does more harm than good I can critique their framing of it without disagreeing with the overall conclusion.
But a lot of people really seem to lack that nuance. It makes it really hard to have an intelligent discussion without being flooded with strawman arguments in response, arguing against points that I didn't make.
I guess it's the price we all pay for getting our news for free. And I don't say that lightly.
Yeah I feel you. But hasn't that always been the case with people?
As far as politics go it's always going to be worse in a 2-party system, though. Around here, most people are used to having different-but-not-completely-different opinions. But many hunger for American-style gamified politics regardless. Once again, I blame Big social media and its algorithms.