Machine Learning

1 readers

1 users here now

Community Rules:

Be nice. No offensive behavior, insults or attacks: we encourage a diverse community in which members feel safe and have a voice.
Make your post clear and comprehensive: posts that lack insight or effort will be removed. (ex: questions which are easily googled)
Beginner or career related questions go elsewhere. This community is focused in discussion of research and new projects that advance the state-of-the-art.
Limit self-promotion. Comments and posts should be first and foremost about topics of interest to ML observers and practitioners. Limited self-promotion is tolerated, but the sub is not here as merely a source for free advertisement. Such posts will be removed at the discretion of the mods.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

communick@academy.garden

[N] OpenAI Announces Leadership Transition, Fires Sam Altman (alien.top)

submitted 1 year ago by Sm0oth_kriminal@alien.top to c/machinelearning@academy.garden

31 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Source: https://openai.com/blog/openai-announces-leadership-transition

Today, it was announced that Sam Altman will no longer be CEO or affiliated with OpenAI due to a lack of “candidness” with the board. This is extremely unexpected as Sam Altman is arguably the most recognizable face of state of the art AI (of course, wouldn’t be possible without great team at OpenAI). Lots of speculation is in the air, but there clearly must have been some good reason to make such a drastic decision.

This may or may not materially affect ML research, but it is plausible that the lack of “candidness” is related to copyright data, or usage of data sources that could land OpenAI in hot water with regulatory scrutiny. Recent lawsuits (https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/writers-suing-openai-fire-back-companys-copyright-defense-2023-09-28/) have raised questions about both the morality and legality of how OpenAI and other research groups train LLMs.

Of course we may never know the true reasons behind this action, but what does this mean for the future of AI?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] currentscurrents@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This seems pretty sketchy. Lots of angry words, but few details.

Most of this has nothing to do with sexual abuse, but is rather family drama over their dad's will. She says that Sam and his lawyer were able to delay or withhold money she was supposed to inherit, but doesn't really provide details. There's not enough information here to judge the accuracy of her claims.

The sexual abuse allegedly happened when she was 4 and he was 13, but she didn't remember it until some kind of flashback in 2020.

Technological abuse - {I experienced} Shadowbanning across all platforms except onlyfans and pornhub."

Sam is certainly well-connected within the tech industry, but I'm doubtful that he could get that many platforms to ban her. Also, her posts seem to be up and visible right now.

[–] fordat1@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

It all seems vague as hell until some NYTimes/Wapo/WSJ journalist helps parse it all out and writes a clear coherent article about that, also the editor at those papers may not think such a story is newsworthy enough to put resources on that for month for a VC/Startup founders program head but for the CEO of the “hottest” company right now its a no brainer