this post was submitted on 22 May 2026
775 points (98.3% liked)

Privacy

48750 readers
523 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Pandora's iPhone, by Stuart Carlson, 2016. Still spot-on in 2026:

A backdoor for the good guys simply does not exist. Once you build it, hackers walk through, authoritarian governments walk through, and the rest follows.

The UK is pressuring for chat control right now. EU Chat Control initiatives keep popping up. We need to keep saying NO to this!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip -4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I think it's more like a "protest the regime and have a 50+% chance of getting executed for it" thing

[–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Something which the good people at Radio Free Asia have assured me is totally real and definitely happens

[–] Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

And the odds of getting killed at a protest here are what, only 30%? Bullshit. It's a propaganda thing, the US has always been a violent repressive menace to world peace.

[–] LesserAbe@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The odds of getting killed at a protest aren't 30%. If that were true we would have hundreds of thousands dead each year.

[–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Allow me to facetiously talk about the US the way people from this country typically talk about the DPRK:

How do we know they don't kill hundreds of thousands of protestors a year? The repressive ~~government~~ regime hides any information that makes it look bad, such as job reports, climate reports, and war casualties. They've got concentration camps all over and people dissappear all the time. There's just no way we can trust their numbers.

[–] Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Based on what? Statistics provided by the same government we're talking about?

[–] LesserAbe@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

It's a ridiculous claim. If it were 30%, even just off anecdotal data from social media, people you know at work, friends, you would hear about tons of people dying. I've been to numerous protests, I would have personally seen dozens to thousands of people dead.

[–] Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

And the 50% claim I'm responding to is no less ridiculous or baseless, the difference in how people respond to them is pure chauvinism

[–] LesserAbe@lemmy.world 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

You said, "And the odds of getting killed at a protest here are what, only 30%? Bullshit. It's a propaganda thing, the US has always been a violent repressive menace to world peace."

The U.S. has done many reprehensible things. But I'm talking about your specific claim that the odds of getting killed at a protest in the U.S. are 30%, which is false.

[–] Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 hour ago

Learn to read dumbass

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip -5 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 hours ago

Public forum discussions aren't just about persuading the person you're interacting with directly, they're about persuading every single person who reads that interaction for as long as it exists. The only reason not to try is because you suspect you'll come out of it looking worse to observers, not just losing the argument with one person but inadvertently reinforcing their position to third parties and popularizing their views over your own.