this post was submitted on 22 May 2026
134 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

84866 readers
5257 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

All of these supposed deals between these “ai” companies are theoretical handshake “deals” that they’re magically claiming as revenue when no actual money changes hands.

SpaceX would absolutely remain private if they had the option. Elon said a million times that he regrets taking Tesla public and intended to keep SpaceX private forever to avoid investor scrutiny and pesky government regulations.

The only reason they are going public is to pass on the debt to stupid investors, because they don’t have any more money after folding in two loser companies in a last-ditch effort to keep them afloat. Once public, it wouldn’t surprise me if Tesla and SpaceX magically announce a merger, given that only one of those companies makes money (for now).

Oh for sure. I hope Ed Zitron unpacks it. I don’t care enough to figure out the bullshit.