this post was submitted on 22 May 2026
-26 points (31.9% liked)

Linux

65517 readers
294 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by AlpΓ‘r-Etele MΓ©der, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jean_le_Flambeur@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

To be real, this Maschine with HDD and 2gig RAM isnt going to be lightning fast at all

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Sure is, if you use the right tooling.

Heck, my old Xcover phone runs fast GUI on 148 MB RAM and 120 MB storage.

[–] Jean_le_Flambeur@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

And it is "lighting fast" when using modern bloated java script websites? I doubt it

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Lol no, they are never lightning fast, no matter the hardware.

[–] Jean_le_Flambeur@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Well thats what op asked for.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 days ago (2 children)

OP will look for alternative sites quickly, if that's their main device.

[–] sneaky@r.nf 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

OP will have to close the Lemmy tab to do further research

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Not if the browser caches smartly.

Where to cache to? The HDD? The two gig ram?

[–] Jean_le_Flambeur@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

So what site do you use with this Setup to watch HD Videos fast, responsive and without Stutter, lag oder tearing? Cant be youtube

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 0 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

Who said anything about video? That's it's own can of worms.

Peertube or whatever, maybe maximal in FHD. Maybe with mpv, that one supports yt-dlp and has extensive support for low-level adjustments. Also, there's slim native Youtube browsing clients.

[–] OrangePumkin@piefed.nl 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Could you suggest a couple of those slim native youtube browsing clients ?

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I'm currently sorting the AUR clients out, but a few in the official repos:

  • audiotube: KDE Client for YouTube Music
  • plasmatube: Kirigami YouTube video player based on QtMultimedia and youtube-dl
  • streamlink: a plugin-based streaming utility with support for various popular players
  • ytfzf: A POSIX script to find and watch youtube videos from the terminal

Edit: i've given up; there's around 300 clients / downloaders in the AUR

[–] Jean_le_Flambeur@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

He didnt explicitly, but watching media is one of the main things people do in browsers no?

When someone asks about a lighting fast browser experience for his specs, and you say "no problem" one would expect one can use websites, including ones that serve videos no?

Saying yeah, fast browser? no problem! But then referring to yt-dlp for videos is a little misleading no?

I'd don't think you find most videos on peertube at this point of time, and I'm hesitant if it will run fast with those specs, even considering peertube is less bloated than YouTube.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I think you mistake this for a competition? One of the most JS-bloated sites in existence is no benchmark for a amenic system, no matter the webbrowser. There are native youtube browsers & viewers for this.

[–] Jean_le_Flambeur@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Dude there is someone asking for a "lighting fast browser experience" on specs which will not deliver that for most websites most people use.

An honest reply IMHO is to state what will work and what will not.

You set false expectations when basically telling him "yeah no problem".

I try to differentiate this picture by showing what caviots there are.

The reality is: if you are a tech savy person, only use a subset of websites, to which most of the popular websites (youtube, Netflix, prime, insta, etc.pp.) don't belong, you can get something to work. Do I use silicon-valley websites or think they are good? No! But someone who asks such questions is probably not someone who only thinks of HTML only websites and the like when wanting a fast browser.

I try to give honest advise and show that a lighting fast browsing experience is not the same as "you can visit some websites with very light loads and need to close the browser, open terminal and yt dlp, download the video and watch it in a lightweight video player".

Its not about competition it's about actually helping the person looking for advice.

[–] OrangePumkin@piefed.nl 1 points 5 days ago

There are just html only websites ?