Machine Learning

1 readers

1 users here now

Community Rules:

Be nice. No offensive behavior, insults or attacks: we encourage a diverse community in which members feel safe and have a voice.
Make your post clear and comprehensive: posts that lack insight or effort will be removed. (ex: questions which are easily googled)
Beginner or career related questions go elsewhere. This community is focused in discussion of research and new projects that advance the state-of-the-art.
Limit self-promotion. Comments and posts should be first and foremost about topics of interest to ML observers and practitioners. Limited self-promotion is tolerated, but the sub is not here as merely a source for free advertisement. Such posts will be removed at the discretion of the mods.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

communick@academy.garden

Will machine learning be known as bad for the environment? [D] (alien.top)

submitted 11 months ago by Ok_Reality2341@alien.top to c/machinelearning@academy.garden

21 comments fedilink hide all child comments

In my masters degree I always ran many computations as did all my peers

The reality is that more of us are than not are using huge HPC clusters / cloud computing for many hours on each project

The industry is just GPUs going BRRR

I’m wondering if this has potential implications for ML in society as AI/ML becomes more mainstream

I could see this narrative being easily played in legacy media

Ps - yeah while there are researchers trying to make things more efficient, the general trend is that we are using more GPU hours per year in order to continue innovation at the forefront of artificial inference

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Zondartul@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Why not just do an environment tax on every kWt/h produced and then use that environment tax money to fix the environment?

I.e. if burning 1 kg of coal produces 1 kWth of energy and costs 1$, but it costs 10$ to extract 1 kg of coal from the air in the form of CO2, just put a tax on it and make every 1 kWth of coal energy cost 11$ instead.

That way, clean energy is cheaper and more attractive, and dirty energy costs what it truly costs, i.e. the harm to the environment is quantified.