Privacy

48817 readers

870 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago

MODERATORS

206

Canada is about to end private digital conversation — Bill C-22 (dontsurveil.me)

submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by NarrativeBear@lemmy.world to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/47296462

For now, your encrypted messages have a lock on them.

Only you, and the person you're talking to, hold the key. Not the app. Not the company. Not the government. You probably don't think about it. That's the whole point — it just works.

Until, possibly, the end of this summer. Every messaging app in Canada would be required to build a second key.

With Bill C-22, the government would hold the copy. The lock you trust would no longer be a lock only you can open. It would be a lock the locksmith was ordered to duplicate.

Find and email your MP here to voice your opinion.

https://dontsurveil.me/c22/mp/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] freedickpics@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

With Bill C-22, the government would hold the copy. The lock you trust would no longer be a lock only you can open. It would be a lock the locksmith was ordered to duplicate.

I don't think this analogy sells just how bad this is. Building a backdoor means fundamentally weakening the encryption. Instead of having an extra key it's more like building a lock with a concealed button that lets you completely bypass it and open the door, and then just hoping nobody finds it besides the 'right' people (i.e cops and gov).

[–] osanna@lemmy.vg 2 points 2 days ago

Yeah but the bad guys wouldn’t ever dream of using a backdoor that’s meant for the “good” guys. Not at all. Never.