this post was submitted on 28 May 2026
15 points (69.2% liked)

Programming

27076 readers
369 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Has anyone tried in organization to use self hosted llm models for agentic programming?

Im curious if it makes any sense. My organization spends fortune on tokens from us companies. I want to recommend something…

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FishFace@piefed.social 9 points 2 days ago (4 children)

As far as I understand, the only way to get anything resembling usable output for coding is with massive, expensive, labouriously hand-tuned models, not local ones.

[–] Jestzer@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

^^^ This. Tragically, locally run LLMs don’t even hold a candle to “good” cloud-based LLMs like Claude Code.

[–] locuester@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

Qwen 3.6 27B dense is really good. Very usable coding output

[–] Kkk2237pl@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I see that qwen 3.5 has pretty good performance and can be run on macbook with 64GB ram

[–] Penta@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

Qwen 3.6 is even better

I have played with qwen3-coder:30b for my hobby stuff running on my M5 max MacBook and it does alright. It is fast enough and I used ollama tools to let it request files. I haven’t used anything like Claude code to compare it to though, only a bit of the ChatGPT free tier stuff.

[–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago

Deepseek is pretty good the few times I tried it.