this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2026
569 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

85095 readers
5139 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This first bill allows the state of California to regulate and oversee all 3D prints in the name of public safety.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Given they've postponed the standards until 2028, I am skeptical our legislators will be able to develop a viable benchmark. And then I don't imagine it's possible to enforce it.

This is likely to die in court.

[–] HiTekRedNek@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

It'll be enforced just like child porn laws are. If you have enough money or political power (same thing really) then you won't ever see a cop.

But us regular citizens will get fucked. Par for the course for a powerful, authoritarian government.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 10 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

They'll ask chatgpt to generate it. It doesn't need to be viable, it just needs to be impossible for manufacturers to comply with

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 15 hours ago

I don't think California intends to act in bad faith and try to kill the 3D printer industry (or community). I think this is due to misconceptions similar to the notion that one can create encryption with a backdoor that only the good guys can use. It just doesn't math.

And that's exactly what is going to kill the law in the courts, much the way that they've upheld strong encryption and Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996. Allowing the law to come into effect will cause too much damage to industry and the economy.

Granted I can't be absolutely certain of that. We've had a lot of incompetent (or corrupt) judges get confirmed in recent decades, so really anything can happen. But the thing they don't want is what happened after they tried to criminalize printed gun designs in the first place, and see the already-robust 3D printing underground get another growth boost.