this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2026
446 points (97.4% liked)

Technology

85155 readers
4637 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Pechente@feddit.org 66 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Yeah also noticing similar bullshit. People send me exact steps on what to do written by ChatGPT that understands exactly nothing about the context and is therefore often wrong or a half truth at best.

Another client has pushed a single commit to a messy project that added 70k lines and a load of new features. The project is now unmaintainable.

[–] webhead@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

I am not even a developer but I've noticed tickets having a response written clearly by AI that miss several things I already talked to the person over teams about. Like dude read your own fucking comment before you post. The conclusion is wrong and you know that because we talked about it before you had the AI "figure out the problem" in the first place. Fuck. I know reading logs is really time consuming and annoying but the AI isn't always very good or won't just say "hey that log isn't showing that I'm looking for" and instead just hallucinates something.

I don't even hate AI, but could we at least use our fucking brains while using the AI? When it spits out code to me for my home projects, I, someone who is not a developer, still look at the code to make sure it's not say running a loop that will hammer disk looking for 1200 files one at a time instead of pulling a directory listing and searching it or something very similar in the database I'm using. People have gotten so lazy. Maybe they're tired of their bosses trying to force them and are providing garbage? I don't know but can we just not? Lol.

[–] tristynalxander@mander.xyz 10 points 1 day ago

I'm just glad people will write off my terrible code as AI.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Instructions are sloppy, code can be sloppy, but what I find is: when they review code changes they find real stuff. Not all the real stuff, but more real stuff than human reviewers typically find. A code review doesn't need to be perfect, not even 100% correct, it just needs to show you stuff that you look at and think "damn, good to catch this now instead of in a field problem report a year from now..."

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

That's fine when you're looking at 1 or 2 reviews. Now try sifting through hundreds a day.