this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2026
125 points (89.8% liked)

Technology

85119 readers
5002 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] einkorn@feddit.org 60 points 14 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca 50 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

yeah but this one will actually not work as expected, shoot someone in the eye then gaslight you telling you it's your fault that you needed to buy more subscription credits for it to kinda work better

[–] gressen@lemmy.zip 27 points 14 hours ago (2 children)
[–] pageflight@piefed.social 44 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

The foundation of the system is its visual model, which Cheng trained on a custom mosquito dataset. To do that, he relied on a DSLR camera with a high-magnification zoom lens, capturing detailed images of mosquitoes for training data.

So, machine vision model. Cooler project, less clicky title.

[–] terabyterex@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

vision models is what truly broke the barrier. neil degrasse tyson likes to teplace the word "ai" with the generic term "computing". he made the point that before "ai" every advamcement in computing was just called computing. now we give this mystical reverence to this new tech and call it "ai". whether you hype it or hate it, you give it yok much power.

when adobe could remove an onject from a photo we said "cool tech" now its "ai". there really are cool fun tools buy its hard yo find people online to have a down to earth conversation about them. there are people offline i talk to but it would be cool to coolaborayr more

[–] Vipsu@lemmy.world 28 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Its unfortunate how big tech has hacked the word AI to mostly mean these LLM based chatbots or agents.

Even when LLMs are like tiny subset of AI technologies out there.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I see what you did there, you hacker.

[–] Vipsu@lemmy.world 1 points 59 minutes ago

Meant to say hijacked but I guess hacked is close enough.

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub -5 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (2 children)

I actually think DLSS5 isn't that terrible and part of the reason it was so hated was because of "AI". I see it similar to graphic mods or Ray reconstruction (DLSS 4.5), just another tech. Don't like it? Don't use it. Me, on the other hand, want to actually see this happen in real-time, one day. I imagine we could even see proper filters in the future (like this).

[–] Vipsu@lemmy.world 1 points 52 minutes ago (1 children)

As a technology DLSS5 feels a lot like Nvidia RTX remix where game can be modded to look very different from how it was originally intentended to look. If it can be achieved with local hardware it's fine, if it needs internet connection, subscription and huge data-center then not so much.

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 1 points 31 minutes ago

DLSS has always been local. I've never heard about anything cloud-related when it comes to DLSS. The DLSS5 demo was also local.

[–] sun_is_ra@sh.itjust.works 10 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (2 children)

the one from 13 years was about killing flying mosquito and it was later turned out to be ~~fraud~~ (sorry original project wasn't a fraud but it never went into production see replies to this comment).

This uses equipment worth thousands of dollars to kill stationary mosquitos (standing on a white wall).

Maybe it works but it will not "wipe out" his mosquito problem. most mosquitos would be hanging out under your desk where your feet are.

[–] einkorn@feddit.org 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

[...] it was later turned out to be fraud.

Huh? That's news to me. Any source?

[–] sun_is_ra@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

i double checked after I saw your comment:

The original project "Photonic Fence" is real and theoretically work however it never turned into a product because it requires very expensive components to identify and kill a mosquito in the fraction of a second it passes in front of the device not to mention the risk of that laser reflecting on something and blinding a passing person.

However other products with same concept are for sale currently and those are the fraud.

I apologize for the misinformation in my original comment

[–] einkorn@feddit.org 2 points 5 hours ago

Thanks for checking

[–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah why do the mosquitos go for feet >:(

[–] sun_is_ra@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 hours ago
  1. Much harder for you to kill
  2. under your desk is a safe dark place.
  3. Mosquito could wait there for you to come the next day