this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2026
166 points (100.0% liked)

politics

29972 readers
2198 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Even modern day designs have one major flaw: they can't operate in wind. But rest assured, next to that major flaw there are many other flaw as well.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Honestly I just like dirigibles so if they want to bash their heads against walls and build new ones I'll be happy.

[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

I couldn't care less, as long as they don't use hydrogen but helium when they fly over my house.

But from what I've heard from avionic engineers and specialists it's just stupid. But tell that to startups who got a motherload of money from the government consisting of idiots who pull the government's wallet after seeing a 10min presentation which is basically a poorly produced animation video.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Y'know I fucking hate startups simply because they seem to just exist to waste time and money. Doing some fucky R&D for old tech is fine and can be interesting since sometimes someone finds something new to correct old issues, but as soon as a startup gets involved it basically instantly turns into a boondoggle. This is the type of shit that should be left to the Skunkworks and borderline redneck R&D labs in towns you've never heard of not some dipshit who thinks innovation means slapping LEDs on everything.

[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Hey, I have a great idea for transportation! Pods!


every startup these days.

Always a bunch of tech bro's who want to reinvent the train but worse, made an animation of it and somehow manage to hoard in millions for just a dumb concept which would never work.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

You must also watch Adam something. But yeah startups are pretty shit on a baseline, at least when they describe themselves as a startup since if I'm being honest a company just calling themselves new is less of a red flag word.

[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Haha yeah I watch his channel.

Also I dit research work for a billionaire for a while, who wants to invest in green startups (hoping one will be a success and provide a profit over all the investments he made) and there are soooooo many startups doing copy-paste what another one does, but with a different look, while all they are selling a consent they thought of without doing actual research whether it is something that solves a problem, actually could work or is needed. They just invest their savings in a nice presentation and keep the motto "fake it till you make it". I mean, Elon Musk gets away with it all the time, why wouldn't they. And many investors are easily tricked with fancy sycophant presentations.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Which is very annoying since I alone have dozens of better ideas, problem is they're all mundane and have absolutely no flash outside of theoretical branding. The first one is boring as fuck and would just exist to undermine the Tesla charging network, basically in conjunction with electrician unions and guilds manufacture what amounts to generic charging stations to sell to governmental and third party entities. The other is basically to import Japanese vending machines to stick at said charging stations with the end goal of eventually getting hot food ones for the more productive ones.

Problem is they aren't fancy and frankly speaking even if I could get the cash theres a near garuntee that Musk, one of his fanboys, or a Tesla investor would burn down the manufacturing facility before anything ships.

[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Often people with great ideas are not great at selling themselves or their ideas, while people who are good at that often have poor ideas but usually they get the most money. And they are able to change a concept into an actual company, until they find out they don't have any knowledge of engineering, IT, or basically anything really, and they fail and lose all the money. "Oopsie! But I have a other great startup idea that is definitely going to work, pinky swear! More money please!"

My great idea is to hold people responsible for their actions, no matter how much money they have or who their daddy is. But yeah, one can only dream I guess.