this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2026
729 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

85259 readers
5145 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A San Diego police department is facing a lawsuit after jailing a man for a month based on a Flock camera alert that cops allegedly should have known, based on the timestamp, did not depict the car that they were looking for.

Last November, Hugo Parra was arrested on felony charges after San Diego police relied on Flock data and a witness statement to wrongly connect him to an attempted carjacking at gunpoint, the Times of San Diego reported. Cops were looking for a red Alfa Romeo car with tinted windows and a man wearing a gray hoodie, and Parra happened to be wearing a white hoodie while riding in a friend’s car that roughly matched the vehicle description.

Although Flock cameras can capture license plate data, cops did not have even a partial plate to help them verify if the car was involved in a violent crime. But the Flock data cops used to justify the arrest actually showed that Parra was five miles away at the time of the crime, Parra’s attorney, Alex Coolman, told the Times of San Diego. Rather than arrest him, cops could have used that data, as well as Parra’s cellphone location data, to corroborate Parra’s statement that he was innocent, Coolman said.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hirihit640@sh.itjust.works 7 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

monkey paw curls

due to the injustice stated in the post, 10 random prisoners will be released

[–] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 12 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Odds are that will be a net positive for society regardless of if they were guilty or not. Rehabilitation should be the goal, not retribution.

[–] Equinox1289@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 hours ago

"I support rehabilitation, except for my issue that I personally want retribution for" - average voter.

[–] pankkake@lemmy.world 9 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

chicken leg uncurls

The 10 released prisoners are all innocent

[–] felbane@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

rabbit's foot thumps

The ex-prisoners solve world hunger and find a general cure for cancer

[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

Isn't that what got them in prison to begin with?

[–] hirihit640@sh.itjust.works 1 points 12 hours ago

I guess I should have specified "guilty" prisoners to be more in line with the quote