this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
28 points (96.7% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5212 readers
400 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
28
A new wave of startups is tackling a huge emissions source: wildfires (www.canarymedia.com)
submitted 11 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
13 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The growing field of ​“firetech” is reinventing the age-old practice of prescribed burns and devising other novel methods of preventing and suppressing fires.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They're talking about having frequent prescribed burns, as was the practice before European arrival, instead of lower frequency hgih-intensity fires.

[–] TrismegistusMx@slrpnk.net 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That's nothing new. We've been doing that since the 80s.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Not at anything like the needed scale

[–] TrismegistusMx@slrpnk.net -1 points 11 months ago

Well that's because the plan is stupid and ineffective. Far more carbon could be sequestered by growing kudzu and then dumping it down mines.