this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2026
41 points (100.0% liked)

Climate

8719 readers
256 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
41
New San Francisco rule change for major home renovations mandates all-electric (www.sfchronicle.com)
submitted 11 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
12 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Gift links to San Francisco Chronicle articles like this one ask for registration. You can bypass that using 'reader mode' in most browsers, or you can check archive.today for a copy. Be aware that archive.today sometimes modifies archived pages, and generally fails to archive complex multimedia content.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] QualifiedKitten@discuss.online 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

IDK if you're in the US, but anywhere I've lived in the US, induction is expensive and only offered in "premium" homes. Instead we either get crappy electric coils or gas. I'd love to have induction, but am stuck with coils. From a recent comment of mine:

I think cost is probably the main factor. It looks like prices on induction ranges are coming down, but still priced as premium/luxury compared to the electric coils. I looked up the cheapest of both at the local big box home improvement store, and the cheapest option overall is $509 and available for pickup today. The cheapest induction range is $899 and is showing a 7 day lead time.

A lot of people in the US are also really attached to gas, and would choose gas over induction anyway. The cheapest gas ranges are just a little more expensive ($549) than the electric coils.

[โ€“] silence7@slrpnk.net 3 points 7 hours ago

I think it's more that induction is something that gets installed during a major remodel. And it's fairly new, so it's only in the nicer places right now.

If it hadn't rusted out, I'd probably still be using a 1950s coil electric stove