NBA - Main

14 readers

2 users here now

Game analysis, highlights and everything else that is happening in the NBA.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

So far this season, the difference between Chet Holmgren and Wembanyama’s true shooting percentage is basically the same as the difference between Embiid and Dillon Brooks last year (alien.top)

submitted 11 months ago by gusssttshowbiz@alien.top to c/nba@nba.space

24 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Holmgren has a true shooting percentage of .677, compared to Wembanyama’s .517, scoring on a similar volume.

Chet is shooting 10% better from two, 15% better from three, and 12% better from the free throw line.

For comparison, during his MVP season, Embiid had a true shooting percentage of 65.5%, while Brooks was at 49.4% in an awful shooting year.

That is a 16% difference between Chet and Wemby vs. a 16.1% difference between Embiid and Brooks

https://www.basketball-reference.com/players/h/holmgch01.html

https://www.basketball-reference.com/players/w/wembavi01.html

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] North-Maximum-6958@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (3 children)

This is going to be an exhausting ROY race

[–] toadtruck@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Wait for the “Chet isn’t a rookie” narrative to start

[–] Cleavenleave@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

It isn't

Wemby is great and will probably be a hall of fame, so is Chet but the difference is as of now Chet is way more polished and deserving of the ROTY award

[–] SaulPepper@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Meanwhile, Miller is chilling despite being on a bad team. He already proven the doubters wrong, he isn't a bust, and the teams bad performance isnt on him. He doesnt care about personal accomplishments either.