this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2026
41 points (91.8% liked)
Technology
43107 readers
185 users here now
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This is just hype. The marketing hype of these models has focused a huge amount of human effort on looking for vulnerabilities that we could have found before if CTOs could have been convinced that it was worth the time and resource investment to go looking for them.
We now have an industry full of executives who believe they will be the ones held responsible if they don't quickly respond to this "new threat" and so now the engineers who should have been given the time to address technical debt and look for security issues in their products years ago, actually have the remit from the suits to do so.
Any time one of these snake-oil companies tells you that their model found hundreds of security issues in a project, just realise that what it actually did is spit out thousands of useless pages of nonsense that a team of real engineers had to check, and in checking all of the nonsense they realised that hold on a minute, yes this particular function does have a vulnerability. The AI is just giving us permission to look, by pointing its sixth finger at every other line of code.
AI really doesn't have much authority... but anyway, yeah, agreed on all other points.