this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2026
41 points (91.8% liked)

Technology

43107 readers
185 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Late last month, I began to consider withdrawing some money from my savings account to buy gold. It’s the first time I’ve ever thought about panic-buying. For all of the firewalls and two-factor-authentication codes, the safety of the internet is starting to falter. Hackers are gaining the upper hand over organizations around the world—hospitals, energy grids, government agencies, and, yes, banks.

As AI tools have become extremely good at writing code, they’ve also become extremely good at pulling off cyberattacks. (Malware, after all, is still software.) The result has been a change in the scale, speed, and sophistication of hacks that is difficult to overstate: Among its tens of thousands of clients, the cybersecurity firm Palo Alto Networks identified a fourfold increase in daily attacks from 2024 to 2025. Hackers are developing AI-enhanced computer viruses that adapt on the fly to avoid detection. They are automating cyber-espionage campaigns on foreign governments. They are stealing data in minutes instead of hours. “There’s a crazy amount of offensive activity happening right now,” Alex Stamos, a former chief security officer of Yahoo and Facebook, told me. “Companies are getting hacked every single day.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] eleijeep@piefed.social 21 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

This is just hype. The marketing hype of these models has focused a huge amount of human effort on looking for vulnerabilities that we could have found before if CTOs could have been convinced that it was worth the time and resource investment to go looking for them.

We now have an industry full of executives who believe they will be the ones held responsible if they don't quickly respond to this "new threat" and so now the engineers who should have been given the time to address technical debt and look for security issues in their products years ago, actually have the remit from the suits to do so.

Any time one of these snake-oil companies tells you that their model found hundreds of security issues in a project, just realise that what it actually did is spit out thousands of useless pages of nonsense that a team of real engineers had to check, and in checking all of the nonsense they realised that hold on a minute, yes this particular function does have a vulnerability. The AI is just giving us permission to look, by pointing its sixth finger at every other line of code.

[–] Dymonika@beehaw.org 4 points 5 hours ago

The AI is just giving us ~~permission~~ encouragement to look

AI really doesn't have much authority... but anyway, yeah, agreed on all other points.