this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2026
70 points (98.6% liked)
PC Gaming
14874 readers
892 users here now
For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Excluding consoles that could not handle their game would have been worse than them happily taking consumers' money for a game that was so broken that Sony removed it from their storefront?
At the other hyperbolic extreme, should games be allowed to exist that can’t run on the Switch?
I think it’s okay to make games that the technology doesn’t support yet. I bought the XB1 version of CP77. It upgraded to next-gen on my XSX. Runs great.
I mean, I have Macs they can barely run the game but I appreciate them supporting the platform.
What about my comment was hyperbolic? Are you implying that Sony did not in fact remove it from their store due to the atrocious state of the game?
Why are you bringing up the Switch? Cyberpunk 2077 did not launch on the Switch, is still not available for the Switch, and we're talking about Cyberpunk 2077 here.