this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2026
66 points (97.1% liked)

Gaming

5005 readers
114 users here now

The Lemmy.zip Gaming Community

For news, discussions and memes!


Community Rules

This community follows the Lemmy.zip Instance rules, with the inclusion of the following rule:

You can see Lemmy.zip's rules by going to our Code of Conduct.

What to Expect in Our Code of Conduct:


If you enjoy reading legal stuff, you can check it all out at legal.lemmy.zip.


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gila@hexbear.net 4 points 2 weeks ago

I do it now with the PC I paid market price for, if you subsidise the hardware that's just more money left in my pocket. If you're a manufacturer fixing to take a loss on upfront cost, I bet you'd want to have some kind of assurance about the expected later dividend. It's to Valve's credit that they won't lock the device into a particular ecosystem in that way, though I agree the device won't make a big splash as a result of that higher cost. Overall seems like a weird thing to move forward with given the original steam machines from a decade ago failed for the same reason.

Even Xbox's failures in the console hardware market stem from the bundling of Kinect with XBone, which meant it cost more than PS4. Not that a laggy camera feature is comparable to steam machine's advantages over PS5/XSX, but the console with the laggy camera was only $100 more