this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2026
66 points (97.1% liked)

Gaming

5005 readers
184 users here now

The Lemmy.zip Gaming Community

For news, discussions and memes!


Community Rules

This community follows the Lemmy.zip Instance rules, with the inclusion of the following rule:

You can see Lemmy.zip's rules by going to our Code of Conduct.

What to Expect in Our Code of Conduct:


If you enjoy reading legal stuff, you can check it all out at legal.lemmy.zip.


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jeeva@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] MagnificentSteiner@lemmy.zip -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, I see your point. To paraphrase, it says that they have to make a profit and can't guarantee game sales from their own store to offset any potential subsidisation.

My point is that Gaben/Valve have billions and don't need the profit from it. So what if some people use it to play games from other stores? They'll be in the minority for sure.

I guess everyone is too capitalism-brained to see past the profit motive.

[–] jeeva@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I'm not sure you do see my point.

To be clear, nowhere in that article suggests that valve would be making a profit on the current price, or that they "have to make a profit" - just that they would not sell it under cost.

I'm genuinely confused how that becomes "profit motive", or shows greed.