this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2026
91 points (95.0% liked)

Gaming

5046 readers
106 users here now

The Lemmy.zip Gaming Community

For news, discussions and memes!


Community Rules

This community follows the Lemmy.zip Instance rules, with the inclusion of the following rule:

You can see Lemmy.zip's rules by going to our Code of Conduct.

What to Expect in Our Code of Conduct:


If you enjoy reading legal stuff, you can check it all out at legal.lemmy.zip.


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It's a different story for the more established studios with an existing following and previous titles. Game Oracle found that the use of AI by these studios resulted in a significant 40% to 60% drop in sales.

That's a huge difference. AI stigma seems to hit competent developers with a lot to lose the hardest, and I'm not sure that game studios are ready to accept it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

The problem I have is “using AI” could be something as simple as coding autocomplete. Or documentation help. Or scaling sprites. Things like that.

It could be done completely locally.

Hence the term isn’t really fair. It’s not even in the same class as shipping sloppy shovelware, or burning tens of thousands of dollars of tokens making junk, or encountering gross or broken stuff in game.

I think Valve should avoid a term as overloaded as “AI” and more clearly define it as “vibe coding, or gratuitous use of generated assets in game.”